On , President Biden signed into law the American Save Package Operate (ARPA). This legislation has a number of provisions of importance to consumers and consumer attorneys. This article focuses on the Act’s implications for the practice of consumer law.
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provides for $1400 per individual in stimulus payments for the majority of Americans. Come across ARPA § 9601.
The December 27 legislation provided that stimulus payments (typically $600 per individual) under that legislation would not be reduced to offset federal debts or to pay state child support enforcement orders and cannot be garnished by judgment creditors. The December 27 payments were coded in a way that banks can recognize them and automatically protect them if they receive a bank account garnishment order. See Societal Legislation Zero. 116-260, Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, div. N § 272.
Because ARPA was passed through budget reconciliation, ARPA does not contain these protections (other than protection against offset for child support), so that ARPA stimulus payments are vulnerable to garnishment in a way quite similar to the vulnerability of the typically $1200 stimulus payments pursuant to the , CARES Act. As such, reference should be made to an earlier blog post bringing guidance on preventing garnishment and set off of CARES Act payments. Nevertheless, many of the emergency state protections listed in that article have now expired.
A bill has been introduced to provide similar protections from garnishment for ARPA payments as the provided for in the , Personal Laws No. 116-260. Be alert to new legislation that might offer these protections for ARPA payments.
Delaware limitations bank account garnishments, and you may Ca, Massachusetts, and New york manage a particular dollar matter into the a lender account since the automatically exempt out of garnishment. Various other states, immediately after a checking account was frozen pursuant to help you an effective garnishment acquisition, an individual would need to increase applicable exemptions, both for funds for the a checking account otherwise a very general “wild cards” exemption. For lots more information, see:
Exemptions applicable to “public benefit payments” in at least some states have been treated as applicable to federal stimulus payments. In addition, some state emergency COVID-19 orders issued in the spring or summer of 2020 may still be in place, preventing bank account garnishment. A current tracker of these state actions is found here.
If the a customer believes the client’s family savings will probably become at the mercy of an effective garnishment buy to repay a judge wisdom, watch for if the stimuli fee try individually placed for the bank account, and move the cash from the account when possible, such if you are paying away from delinquent high priority bills (e.g., rent, mortgage loans, or automobile repayments), to find required points (elizabeth.grams., food), otherwise withdrawing the newest percentage in the bucks. Another option one to reduces but cannot take away the risk of garnishment is always to circulate funds from a checking account to a beneficial prepaid credit card or a unique family savings on an inferior bank otherwise borrowing from the bank relationship. Prepaid service cards or perhaps the brand new account is actually at the mercy of garnishment, however they are less likely to be on creditors’ radar screens.
When a consumer’s Social Security, SSI, or VA benefits are direct deposited into a bank account or a Direct Express card, a dollar value equal to two months’ worth of those deposits is protected from garnishment, even if the amount in the account is traceable to the stimulus payment instead of to those federal benefits. See 31 C.F.R. § 212; NCLC’s Range Measures § 14.5.4. Such an account is thus fully protected from garnishment if the account balance is kept below an amount where deposit of the stimulus payment will still keep the balance under two months’ worth of the federal benefits.